<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/</link>
	<description>Exploring what digital scholarship is and how to do it in the context of the humanities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Euromachs Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities in 2008, by Lisa Spiro</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Euromachs Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities in 2008, by Lisa Spiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-742</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scattered Links - 3/16/2009 &#171; history-ing</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Scattered Links - 3/16/2009 &#171; history-ing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-593</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Emergence of Digital Humanities&#8221; and &#8220;Community and collaboration,&#8221; while Part Two is more sobering, discussing continued resistance to open access and other new scholarly models, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Emergence of Digital Humanities&#8221; and &#8220;Community and collaboration,&#8221; while Part Two is more sobering, discussing continued resistance to open access and other new scholarly models, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia G.</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Lisa,   I&#039;d like to take this opportunity to clarify the class action settlement process, something that many laypeople (and other legal professionals!) find very confusing.  At the moment, there is a settlement on the table that the lawyers representing the Authors, Publishers, and Google have all worked very hard to negotiate.  But, it by no means finalized.  If you read the notice at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/view_notice&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Books Settlement&lt;/a&gt; you will see that first there has to be a hearing before the Judge decides whether or not to finalize the settlement.

Anyone affected by the settlement has three options, one of which is to &quot;Object.&quot;   Objections are taken very seriously by the attorneys involved as well as the Judge, because the more objections there are, the more likely the settlement will be dismantled.  If you feel like fair use principles have been left out of the settlement, and you or anyone reading this blog are class members, by all means write a letter and file an objection.  The letter must be postmarked by May 5, 2009, and follow the rules set out in the notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa,   I&#8217;d like to take this opportunity to clarify the class action settlement process, something that many laypeople (and other legal professionals!) find very confusing.  At the moment, there is a settlement on the table that the lawyers representing the Authors, Publishers, and Google have all worked very hard to negotiate.  But, it by no means finalized.  If you read the notice at <a href="http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/view_notice" rel="nofollow">Google Books Settlement</a> you will see that first there has to be a hearing before the Judge decides whether or not to finalize the settlement.</p>
<p>Anyone affected by the settlement has three options, one of which is to &#8220;Object.&#8221;   Objections are taken very seriously by the attorneys involved as well as the Judge, because the more objections there are, the more likely the settlement will be dismantled.  If you feel like fair use principles have been left out of the settlement, and you or anyone reading this blog are class members, by all means write a letter and file an objection.  The letter must be postmarked by May 5, 2009, and follow the rules set out in the notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-08 &#171; storyglot</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-08 &#171; storyglot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-562</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access « Digital Scholarship in ... Open access, just like dark chocolate and blueberries, is good and good for you, enabling information to be mined and reused, fostering the exchange of ideas, and ensuring public access to research that taxpayers often helped to fund. (tags: publishing Academic opensource openaccess digitalhumanities) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access « Digital Scholarship in &#8230; Open access, just like dark chocolate and blueberries, is good and good for you, enabling information to be mined and reused, fostering the exchange of ideas, and ensuring public access to research that taxpayers often helped to fund. (tags: publishing Academic opensource openaccess digitalhumanities) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transitions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities - a summary of 2008 - The University of Iowa Libraries</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Transitions &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities - a summary of 2008 - The University of Iowa Libraries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-538</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Early Modern Notes &#187; Recently noted around the web</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Early Modern Notes &#187; Recently noted around the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-534</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access&#160;&#160;Lisa Spiro reviews the last year for digital humanities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Humanities in 2008, II: Scholarly Communication &amp; Open Access&nbsp;&nbsp;Lisa Spiro reviews the last year for digital humanities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planned Obsolescence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities Roundup</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Planned Obsolescence &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Humanities Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] in order to point to Lisa Spiro&#8217;s fantastic post rounding up and reflecting on important developments in the digital humanities in 2008, with particular attention to issues of scholarly communication and open access. This post is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in order to point to Lisa Spiro&#8217;s fantastic post rounding up and reflecting on important developments in the digital humanities in 2008, with particular attention to issues of scholarly communication and open access. This post is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briefly Noted for February 25, 2009</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Briefly Noted for February 25, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-509</guid>
		<description>[...] Spiro continues her excellent roundup of Digital Humanities in 2008 with a discussion of developments in the area of open access. Readers should also make sure to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spiro continues her excellent roundup of Digital Humanities in 2008 with a discussion of developments in the area of open access. Readers should also make sure to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wilkens</title>
		<link>http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/digital-humanities-in-2008-ii-scholarly-communication-open-access/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wilkens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Wonderful as always, Lisa! Thanks for putting these posts together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful as always, Lisa! Thanks for putting these posts together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
